Chile, I was minding my enterprise, making ready for bed final night when I saw THIS article stumble upon my timeline from Leisure Weekly:
My initial reaction:
Per Gregory Allen Howard, the screenwriter and producer for essentially the most recent Harriet biopic, an unnamed studio govt suggested Julia Roberts play Harriet Tubman in 1994, when the film used to be in early production.
Gregory recalled with the outlet, “I was told how one studio head mentioned in a meeting, ‘This script is unimaginable. Let’s salvage Julia Roberts to play Harriet Tubman’.”
Gregory continued, asserting, “When someone pointed out that Roberts couldn’t be Harriet, the governmentanswered, ‘It used to be see you later within the past. No one is going to know the disagreement.'”
Fortunately, that irascible idea used to be by no system belief of as and the fragment went to the proficient and decorated Broadway actress Cynthia Erivo.
Then all over again, that didn’t pause Twitter from eviscerating the mere belief of suggesting Julia Roberts to play Harriet. Right here are one of the major totally reactions:
Even Sophia Turner weighed in:
This individual joked that a record of Julia Roberts will seem on the $20, standing in for Harriet, if/when she does replace Andrew Jackson:
Others assumed Julia Roberts wished nothing to provide with this mess:
The preferrred lesson for studio exes right here? Historical unlit figures ought to detached be played by unlit other folks — and yes, we can peek if now not. K, Bye.